some people think that all teenagers should be requiredto do unpaid work in their free time to helpthe local community.they beleive this would benefitvboth the individual teenager and society as a whole
Socially active young adults are perfect sign of a dynamic and intense community. However, i do not suggest a compulsory gratuitous work for them since its a choice of personal interest.
Supporters argue that these youngsters with full of energy and spirit should be guided in a way that both community and the individual should benefit. They enlist a lot of personal advantages of community service like high level of interaction skills,good amount of connectivity with people,improves self confidence,provides sense of purpose etc.But i strongly believe that anything out of compulsion would not bring a beneficial effect.
Further more, these school or collage going volunteers may not be getting enough time to indulge in charity works, because of their increasing load of studies. They need proper time for relaxation also, for a better performance in academics as well as personal life. So forcing them for community works may increase their stresses and deteriorate their studies.One more important point is that if they are not passionate, this unprofited work will make future adults but immature fellows discouraged, that they may carry even in their adult life. On the other hand, some pupil does social services for scholarships and some course admissions which again spoils the ultimate aim of social responsibility. From the above discussed points its very clear that compelling teenagers may not end up with good results.
In conclusion, participation of future adults in social work is to be encouraged, but not to be forced since it may lead to potential dangers than possible benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dynamic and intense community. However, i do not suggest a compulsory gratuitous ...
^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...mpulsory gratuitous work for them since its a choice of personal interest. Suppo...
^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , good
...ce like high level of interaction skills,good amount of connectivity with people,impr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , improves
...,good amount of connectivity with people,improves self confidence,provides sense of purpo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , provides
...ity with people,improves self confidence,provides sense of purpose etc.But i strongly bel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...onfidence,provides sense of purpose etc.But i strongly believe that anything out of...
^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: One
... stresses and deteriorate their studies.One more important point is that if they ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32941176471 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01868078461 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3658667279 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.9 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18406269684 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628027022975 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274173915557 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918074758582 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340831882013 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.