Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.to what extend do you agree
Significance of group level cognition in improvising brilliance of an individual is renowned for ages. I completely agree with this notion as it enhancing the chance of socialization and maximise the consolidated calibers which in turn advances essential skills of individuals.
To begin with, study groups have been designed and incorporated into our school curriculum by pedagogical experts, proving the role of study groups in improving pupils potential for further or higher education. These scholars made it perspicuous through their studies that team activities provide a better platform to learn from each other, to attain communication skills and to develop interpersonal relationships. In addition, it foster creativity, builds trust and motivates each other. For instance, a study by British council for learning found that students participated in study groups had a far more objectives and sophisticated understanding about topics than those studied in isolation. So it is clear that collaborative approaches are highly advantageous in acquiring vital aptitudes.
Next, but equally important is team sports, which requires a diverse range of mental calculations to perform. Many researches revealed that there is a correlation between group sporting and many other qualities. Because of opportunity to try, win or loose together people involved in sports naturally adopt a mature mindset that can sharpen ones thoughts and determination improving their intelligence. Moreover, essential qualities like self-esteem, confidence, discipline, patience and resilience can be improved through the sporting. All these skills adds to a better cognitive performance.
Overall, it appears that team activities, offer a guided path to autonomous learning and rational thinking which can impart a higher cognitive abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Significance of group level cognition in improvising brilliance of an individual...
^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of group level cognition in improvising brilliance of an individual is renowned ...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fosters'?
Suggestion: fosters
...personal relationships. In addition, it foster creativity, builds trust and motivates ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to find', 'to found'
Suggestion: to find; to found
...a study by British council for learning found that students participated in study gro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and many other qualities. Because of opportunity to try, win or loose togethe...
^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...adopt a mature mindset that can sharpen ones thoughts and determination improving t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndset that can sharpen ones thoughts and determination improving their intelligen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89473684211 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23978148479 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695488721805 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.525371472 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128799829116 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374986405943 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242808309381 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701360109706 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102331985486 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.