Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In general, subjects which are beneficial to salaries, positions and career are the most people’s choice. While some argue that deciding disciplines which are students’ interests is the most suitable way to learn in academic courses. Both sides are reasonable and need to be discussed in more detail.
There are various reasons why people prefer to major in practical subjects rather than their favorite ones. They believe that these subjects like science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, namely STEM subjects are more popular nowadays as these subjects not only have great impacts on people’s career, but also are more functional in daily lives. For example, people who majored in chemistry are capable of making soaps by themselves. They can save the money which takes on purchasing them. In addition, when people have the knowledge about atmospheric, people can easily project weather through measurements.
Despite the fact that some subjects are less useful, they also have different merits on people’s behaviors and manners. For example, philosophy always gives diversity ways to think independently. On the other hand, if people study their favorite subjects, they can put more efforts on difficult courses and cope with any troubles during these classes. Meanwhile, the society also demands people who are specialize in various disciplines as development of countries still needs knowledge in different fields.
In my opinion, I also believe that students should study in subjects which they like since they can provide students higher motivation in learning as encountering problems. As a result, the government must establish a series of education system as well as provide resources to help students explore their interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nwhile, the society also demands people who are specialize in various disciplines as de...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'specialized'.
Suggestion: specialized
...the society also demands people who are specialize in various disciplines as development o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in general, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58364312268 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86659286477 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6583780566 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279163227871 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834961991663 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710227355493 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158568122562 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325961753803 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.