In modern days, one of the most controversial issues related to what subject to learn university students. "they should gain knowledge that associated to their interest" think most people while rest of them believe that to bring prosperity, people who are entering a university only need to choose such a subject as science and technology. In this essay, I am going to examine this situation from both points of view. Firstly, I will consider personal aspirations and then secondly a possibility to rapidly increase the development of science and technology.
On one side of the argument, there are people who claim that studying subject made by own decision considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The primary reason for believing this is that trying to gain undesired knowledge abolishes a passion to study. Otherwise, It is also possible that learning to own favorite things may create happiness. This positive emotion may rise an effort to study. One important illustration of this is nowadays every year about 12000 students abandon a university cause of studying their unwilling subject.
On the other hand, If many students studied one subject, a competition of it will increase quality. People often have this opinion because the competition is the key of development. A particularly good example in here is that researches found that, as last five year in the US, a quarter of students who enrolled in a university chose marketing of the business, competitions of marketing of business dramatic jumped. Similarly, the quality of that rapidly increased between the last five year than the past.
In conclusion, as we have seen, they are uneasy to discuss this topic. On balance, However, I tend to believe that in university, students should choose a subject that will be better in the evaluation of the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... science and technology. In this essay, i am going to examine this situation from...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27430555556 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97705142144 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1143002297 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293893660089 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798628075513 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771762524519 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164570524795 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616608205904 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.