Opinions are divided that either college students should choose subjects following their interest and passion or there should be a compulsory curriculum including subjects which will prove useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. This essay will discuss both views then I will give my perspective.
On the one hand, a curriculum that has a limited number of subjects can be a great offer for many students who hesitate about their career path. In the modern age, attending science and technology-related degrees totally fits the tendency of the labor market because this will provide numerous opportunities for students after completing graduation. For example, a tech giant Apple has been reported to move its manufacturing to Vietnam, which leads to the rapid rise in technological employment. Apart from it, emphasizing science and technology studies in universities will accelerate the pace of technological innovations, and thereby stimulating economic growth in the long-run.
On the other hand, if the students have the right to study the course of their choice, it will still benefit societal development. Because the development of humankind is inextricably linked to the occupational diversity of society, offering a broad range of courses at the tertiary level is crucial. There is no doubt how important science and technology are; however, many other fields can not be extinct or totally replaced by mass production, such as tourism, art, and business. A university in which its students are passionate about what they are learning would be an advance educational environment because, besides knowledge, it trains students independence and determination as well.
In conclusion, although it is reasonable for universities to focus on the most useful subjects, the importance of other subjects should not be ignored. In my opinion, tertiary students should be given the freedom to learn subjects they feel passionate about.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, still, then, well, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48196721311 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08300645192 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.479305436 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371204404375 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124132409508 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723305432261 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230495762394 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593611000601 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.