Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that all tertiary students should only study useful subjects in the future, others argue that they should study whatever subjects they like. In my point of view, higher education students should be able to choose their preferred study course.
There are many reasons that people believe in the merit of studying only useful subjects in the future like science and technology. One of that may be because of the obvious contribution of studying those subjects to national development. For example, people often perceive a doctor's contribution to society as higher than that of an artist. Besides, students who graduate in these subjects may have better job offers, higher salaries and career progression. This helps to improve the quality of their life. Therefore, learning subjects that are considered useful in the future is not only beneficial for the learners but also for the economy and society.
Although the advantages of studying those subjects can easily be seen, I believe that students should be free to choose what they want to study. Since others subjects still contribute to the society and when doing what they like they can create more values for the economy. Moreover, it cannot be sure which subjects are most useful in the years ahead. There may be a different trend from what people predicted. Therefore, the useful subjects at that time may not relate to science and technology anymore.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of the university to focus on specific useful subjects, I prefer students should have the right to decide their subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...t. For example, people often perceive a doctors contribution to society as higher than ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14230769231 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50212631469 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534615384615 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4399062551 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518461132141 0.244688304435 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16429106572 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135727621056 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307672205004 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158858696092 0.056905535591 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.