Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Thanks to the rapid development of international trade, products are easily transported to every corner of the world. Therefore, people can purchase the same things anywhere. However, this makes countries more and more alike. In my point of view, a development that leads to the similarity of the countries is negative.
Firstly, when countries become more and more similar, it may cause them to lose their characteristics and identity. Each country has its unique characteristics, which makes them different from others. So that when everyone can buy the same products, the risk of losing those unique things may be significant. Because if every country has the same items, there are not many differences between those countries. Moreover, this will take away the diversity of the countries in the world.
Secondly, that development may cause countries to experience a reduction in their national tourism revenue. Such as, specialty food is one of the factors that can attract tourists to a country but if they can find a place that sells the food in their living place, this may discourage them to travel to that country. As a result, the country's tourism development will be affected when few people come to visit. For example, if people can eat pho - a famous Vietnamese dish everywhere, it will make foreign food lovers not interested in coming to Vietnam anymore.
In conclusion, from the above reasons, I believe that the development that increases the similarity in countries will bring more disadvantages to them than benefits. As this need fulfilled by the air transportation, which uses the fuel, that produces the toxic gases and ultimately contributes to the air pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16423357664 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93926172774 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8778125094 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307416371564 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107154566758 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718506106284 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195493854506 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898632561856 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.