Selecting university major nowadays is a crucial issue that has preoccupied every mentor to have suggestion for that. Some people assertively claim that student should be free to choose their major that they have affection for that. On the flip side, others hold the opposite view and they say believe that it would be wise if students pursue a field of study which would be effective in the future with respect to economic improvement and progress in science and technology. In my opinion, all the majors could have their own upsides to the both individuals and communities, so that I think the idea of the first party seems more reasonable. In this essay, I am going to delve to both points of views.
Restricting students to choosing some limited sorts of university field that would affect our future positively is very prevalent in our schools throughout the world by some consultants. By their prophecy, these are determined that majors would definitely lead to bright and prosperous future for students, although it is come up by current condition of society. For example, during the last 10 years the dominated career that has been embracing a significant part of the employment opportunities and alive industry in Iran is civil engineering. Thus, consultation in high school almost stimulates students to consider civil or architecture engineering as their priority in order to study universities. However, this indiscriminate decision is made mere by taking into account short-term results regardless of probable alteration over long-term perspective.
On the other hand, it is often quoted from eminent psychologist that human beings would adore following whatever they are passionate about. Similarly, selecting university major is an issue that should be chosen by a comprehensive consideration of student interest no matter what others say. Of course, to some extent, it is true that consultation is helpful in turn but it should be rational. Not only would inappropriate consulting blow up student’s future by undermining their interest, but it would also somehow kill their potential for beloved major for good. As a personal experience, about eleven years ago, I chose mechanical engineering as my field of study in university and I continue this major until master, though it was a definite waste of time. Unfortunately, my current job is completely irrelevant to my master degree in the light of the light of the fact that I decided to work in my beloved major, I mean civil engineering that has nothing to do with mechanic.
To sum up, It would be wise let student free choose their majors no matter how absurd it is called by others. Not only prohibiting students from pursuing their interest would ruin their flourishing, but also it would have detrimental effects on communities and students life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, thus, for example, i mean, i think, of course, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15869565217 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9724721592 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2116882336 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22366313676 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729443759732 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722501582214 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139331993404 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733581742823 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.