Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that raising the lowest legal age for car drivers and motorcyclists is the best way for improvement of traffic safety. While I think age limit adjustments for road users would be beneficial for road safety, I hold a strong belief that other alternatives could also bring numerous significant advantages.
On the one hand, a higher minimum age for drivers and motorists could help to strengthen road safety due to several reasons. First, these people are generally expected to be old enough to meet physical requirements to control the vehicles safely. To be more specific, riders are supposed to be tall and strong enough to balance and handle such big speedy motorbikes, unless they want to encounter dangerous uncontrolled situations. Furthermore, this solution might generate such a significant decline in the number of people controlling transportations because people under a driving age limit would tend to use public transports or be carried by the older.
On the other hand, I believe that there are a variety of more effective options for traffic safety. The first choice could be that governments should allocate funds for traffic infrastructure such as building more roads and widening traffic areas. As a result, vehicles on the roads would become more accessible, the fact helps to reduce traffic congestion and improve traffic flow. Another useful measure might be strict punishments for lawbreakers in traffic. The pressure of paying a fine or even being in jail appears to make road users think twice and take into account any traffic violations. For example, the number of accident cases in Vietnam has decreased significantly because of a considerable amount of fine paid for not wearing helmets when being in traffic.
In conclusion, although increasing driving and riding age limit seems to be advantageous, I believe that there exist other options that could have more substantial merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | Tinylavender | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 84
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wearing helmets when being in traffic. In conclusion, although increasing drivi...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat could have more substantial merits.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, then, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23948220065 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87715188224 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1180042568 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19817247604 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741164397201 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565232495718 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132879976796 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510759314349 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.