some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. to what extend do you agree or disagree ?
It is discussed that the expansion of the driving age is the salient factor to keep traffic participants safe. Personally, I disagree with this statement. In my opinion, there are other ways that outweigh the increase in age.
On the one hand, the minimum legal age for driving is thought to be considered the best for some reasons. Firstly, young people’s intellectual standard is at a low-level. Viet Nam perfectly exemplified this situation. The education system in this developing country is notorious and reformed annually. In addition, the majority of the population have manual jobs with a low salary. As a result, youngster do not have enough conditions to develop themselves and the awareness of the society in a good way with a poor socio-economic backgrounds. Secondly, it is true that older people have to work to support and provide for their family. So, they are more responsible for their life and the community than young people when being a part of traffic flows
On the other hand, I believe that the authorities should use other methods which contribute positives to the nation. One of them is that the government would pour money into investing infrastructure such as overpass and subway which not only lessen traffic accidents but also help citizens save a great deal of time. The second approach is that the penalties for traffic offenders should be increased. It is true that money plays a vital role in life. Hence, when imposed a heavy fine, people would limit the possibility of collision on the road.
In conclusion, increasing the driving age should not be considered the best to protect inhabitants in traffic. Granted, it is predicated on logical reasons, but other methods are more optimal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ople's intellectual standard is at a low-level. Viet Nam perfectly exemplified this si...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'background'?
Suggestion: background
...n a good way with a poor socio-economic backgrounds. Secondly, it is true that older people...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns, but other methods are more optimal.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08013937282 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86999742786 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.209793073 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7647058824 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209432671258 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608944594222 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746106822211 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125460873834 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532531028933 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.