Some people believe that raising fuel prices is the most effective way to address global environmental issues. Although this idea could help reduce harmful fumes, I think there is some better and alternative solution to these issues.
In the first place, The increase in fuel prices not only puts a financial strain on citizens but also doesn't do much to improve the environment. First, gasoline becoming more expensive may cause companies whose top priority is making profits to increase the price of their products to cover the rising transportation cost. This results in the goods on the market becoming less affordable, and citizens have to pay more for their living expenses. Second, raising fuel costs is not the best solution since the fuel can be considered one of the necessities of humankind. No matter how costly it will be, people still willing to buy it to satisfy their demand, which fails to meet the initial purpose of saving the environment.
Another solution that can deal with environmental issues without causing people financial hardships is ensuring the quality of mass transit. For example, the government can either allocate a national budget for the equipment of modern air-conditioners inside the bus or the addition of bus routes. When people feel comfortable and convenient to use, public transportation will attract more passengers, which will reduce the number of private vehicles on the road and the harmful emissions they produce. This method is also what the Vietnamese government did in the past year. As a result, there are reports that the local atmosphere has significantly improved.
In conclusion, although we can't deny the effect of raising fuel costs, it's still not the best way to solve environmental problems. The ideal solution would be to improve the quality of the mass transit system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...a financial strain on citizens but also doesnt do much to improve the environment. Fir...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...improved. In conclusion, although we cant deny the effect of raising fuel costs, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17785234899 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78259153289 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9297074515 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240756852918 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733660674319 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726981704833 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140274887972 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054757819323 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.