Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people have valued sticking at the same job during their life time over against changing their job periodically. While the former approach seems to have several boons in its favor, I personally believe that experiencing multiple jobs during a life would be more beneficial in shaping an individual’s future.
On one hand, it is believed that the people remaining in the same possession during their work-life live a more stable life. Undeniably, having a stable income and an overview of the future promotions are indispensable advantaged of a permanent job. Nevertheless, these promotions may be limited and they would possibly happen in long term schedule. Unfortunately, this approach is embraced by the ones having less tolerance against risky situations.
But from another angle, the people who do not take the chance of changing their job are likely to lose a myriad of more glamorous opportunities. An occupant, although specialized in a certain field, may be able to find a pile of other positions which are not only better paid, but also with more extra benefits. In addition, he can master different types of other professional skills and become a multi-skilled person in his fields of interest.
Moreover, experiencing alternative workplaces plays an important role in equipping an individual with a more well-rounded perspective on marketplace. A person with a broad overlook on the market may be able to make more beneficial decisions and even start his own business.
In conclusion, I believe that the people who are always seeking better positions compared to their mean time, live a more exciting and successful life as opposed to the ones who resist against any changes in their permanent occupation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...d sticking at the same job during their life time over against changing their job periodi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e that the people who are always seeking better positions compared to their mean ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26618705036 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07853991393 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7881532602 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104103981751 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415638788617 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578375128694 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600492301025 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389508243279 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.