XXX
These days, there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of XXX. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of XXX as thoroughly constructive while others hold an opponent's view. I am inclined to believe that XXX is beneficial and should be promoted.
There are several reasons why XXX is advantageous. First of all, it is argued that XXX plays a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This is attributed to the fact that XXX, therefore they would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which would open avenues to new achievements so that XXX's determination and enthusiasm would be amplified towards many daunting tasks. Take XXX for example, even XXX have to do uphill struggle to XXX.
In addition, it is claimed that XXX. This is to say that XXX, which would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem so that xxx are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2015 found that XXX would enhance the XXX's intellectual abilities to make decisions related to social and personal life.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that XXX would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of XXX and increase XXX's confidence. It is expected that institutions take cognizance of these facts and begin to adopt this way of XXX.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06578947368 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00800141021 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5521491208 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.624223047641 0.242375264174 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.292810152805 0.0925447433944 316% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130118252413 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41936403056 0.151781067708 276% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506126361973 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.