Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good. What is your opinion?
In recent decades, job-hopping has been endured by numerous employees. While I accept that changing jobs have many disadvantages, it is not to say that shouldn’t be promoted. In this essay, I intend to discuss both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why I agree that changing jobs could act as a deterrent for the society. First of all, this totally can make a disorder to the labor market. To be more specific, some companies could be lacked staff while others have to reduce their number of workers, especially when employees are enabled to change their jobs too easily. Secondly, when a high-qualified worker changes their career unexpectedly, there is various risks have been taken. Such as misunderstandings about the brand new job or shortage experience, which may affect their productivity.
On the other hand, there are more compelling reasons why I firmly believe that job-hoppers can create board-based benefits for the community. By getting their hands on various tasks through trying new careers, workers are more likely to acquire useful skills and advanced knowledge, thereby becoming more well-rounded. Moreover, employees can make new friends and develop more serious relationships due to changing jobs periodically.
To sum up, I pen down saying that although job-hopping can be negativity and risk to the economy, it is still a potential remedy to improve individuals’ living standards. So, however, I am strongly convinced that we should give it a chance to gain more popularity in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are various risks'?
Suggestion: there are various risks
...rker changes their career unexpectedly, there is various risks have been taken. Such as misunderstandi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, such as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28112449799 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08978142366 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8180400933 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.153846154 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13945165789 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519495964409 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464285221644 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819019947402 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420396083437 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.