Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that pollution control and payment for cleanliness would be the companies responsibility rather than the government. However, in this essay agree with the statement, because, cleaning wages and expense of pollution control makes company to be aware and reduce the expulsion. While, government can take legislation and preventive measures through appropriate rules and regulation over the pollution consequences.
On the one hand, companies looked up to profitability than environmental hazards. Get ride of detrimental effect of pollutants companies should pay for cleaning process and proper disposal or expel waste management. Such as, regenerating products and recycling process could enhance the limitation of excretion. Thereby, expenditure for pollution control belongs to the hands of company makes recycling process rather than throwing outside. For instance, new legislation of the local council of Chennai regarding the pollution management in industrial based declined the disposal of waste in rivers and outside land.
On the other hand, spending money for pollution by the government makes companies irresponsibility towards the problem. In brief, expenditure of pollution consequences under control of government has loop hole to the capitalist and increasing bribe may alter the credibility of program. Escalating studies regarding such problems may delaying the exact result to the core. For example, tackling the industrial waste disaster by the government of Indonesia still on process and people has been suffering the dilemma of pollution. Furthermore, in fact, government can spend money for disaster management and environmental protection instead of clean up and reducing pollution which company could produce.
To sum up, legislation and regulation can be done by government rather spending money for cleaning and after process. Private companies or entrepreneur could pay for such process would enhance the responsibility of companies and they can limit the excreta and somehow make new methods for disposal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-27 | Paramdeepsingh | 56 | view |
- scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Nowadays companies are trying to increase the sales of their products in various ways What are the different methods that they use Which one is the most effective
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- with an increasing population communicating via the internet text messaging and face to face communication will become a thing of the past to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- many people think that countries should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible to what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...nd payment for cleanliness would be the companies responsibility rather than the governme...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, may, regarding, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in brief, in fact, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82781456954 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09584055822 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1526706542 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192126938575 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698030703179 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499860305862 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125948604209 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00975838421315 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.