People are calling into question the usefulness of competitive sports. Whilst a number of people underscore the importance of competitive sports as a rewarding contentious topic in favour of a wide variety of public, others advocate that it tends to be problematic this type of sports which makes conflict among people. There are rational arguments on both sides of this controversy which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, the most compelling reason is that competitive sports are a cornerstone of flourishing one's mental and physical abilities. That is to say, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of personality, sports are believed to be a lever to the recognition of capabilities of individuals by nurturing and working on them with all ages in various cultural background. More specifically, when a person tends to take part in a rivalry he should work out on specific skill eventually leading to improvement in the mental power. Such a person can display acumen in facing demanding situation and take decisive action in a dilemma due to learn to deal with in a difficulty. Therefore, rivalry allows people leaning soft skills such as making judicious and rising to a challenging circumstance.
On the other hand, others put forward an argument that competitive sports may prove some drawbacks to people. Simply put, some of these competitors which their home country suffering from crippling sanction when faced with another competitor is bound to take revenge and follow their social ambition. Take Iran and the United States of America as the most obvious patently example; in free fighting competitions, participates invite each other by the internet to fight on the field. As a result of this, competitive sports have a far-reaching effect on rising conflict and tension between people from different countries.
To conclude, the benefit accruing from competitive sports are by no means negligible, it is my firm conviction that in some cases it would be a causative factor to make a new enemy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement in the mental power. Such a person can display acumen in facing demanding s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1755952381 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9825749972 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7904696993 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.769230769 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247874482887 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846428971552 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636368465107 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137145005477 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231720073935 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.