Some people think that computer skills should be made as fourth skill in education. To what extent do you agree?
In many parts of the world today, more dwellers have concerned about education. It is hypothesised that apart from SKILLS such as reading, writing and maths, it is reluctant for teachers to add computer techniques in official subjects of education. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is convincible.
To commenCE with, there have been numerous folks who are in favour of the idea in some aspects. First and foremost, most jobs or educations have entailed elements which relate to computer sides. This can be fathomed that computers have been renders aids in analyses, probabilities, managements and the like. Therefore, diverse experts have striven their best to unify work and computers in order to reinforce businesses. A case in this point, following CNN channel, most high school in Vietnam, all students compulsorily pursue computer techniques so that they can have adequate abilities to accomplish projects from teachers. By virtue of the fact that computers are regarded to be gadgets which replicate lessons, so students have more chances to comprehend apparently in all aspects of work. These tactics have been implemented in every schools in the north of Vietnam. As a bonus, computer subjects can enhance logical abilities of human. It is obvious that people in all probability attain more knowledge in sides of lives such as operations, order, details and the like. As a results, inhabitants will probably obtain more successful goals in the not too distant future. Indeed, in some research from scientists in China, children who were brilliant in computers performed excellently in engineering tests rather than those who did not go for these stuff. Consequently, governors of this nation have encouraged their citizens to pursue these issues. Another possibility is that more skills mean that people have more talents. From this point, it is not superfluous to bonus more subjects to education.
Vice versa, there have been various detrimental factors in this theme. One of them is that computer skills require enormous investments in equipment. Computers consist numerous devices which are expensive to most folks, so these suggestions are not compatible to some nations or families. Aside from that, students have no chances to thrive themselves if computers are taught merely by theories. However, due to awareness in advantages, governments can sponsor in these sources instead of spending more money in other elements. Therefore, these obstacles can be tackled carefully. A case in this point, according to VNN articles, Vietnam have had more intelligent labours after governments determined to consume money in computers for children at schools. This has triggered incentives for most countries in Asia.
In brief, folks have no ways to reject advantages of this recommendation by aforementioned views. Besides, drawbacks of this theme are not serious sufficient for people to pay attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1080, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...ations, order, details and the like. As a results, inhabitants will probably obtain more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, in brief, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37608695652 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88186674824 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 506.74238477 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8159911103 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5925925926 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.037037037 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.37037037037 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122442461551 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370548659592 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038762649665 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733734269581 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327885055908 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.