Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In many parts of the world today, more folks have concerned about THE universe. It is hypothesized that there will probably numerous sabotages to human if scientists sustain CONTACTING other planets in order to meet demands. This essay attempts to debate numerous aspects of this theme.
There have been more folks who are in favor of the idea. First and foremost, governors of nations in all probability obtain detrimental impacts of economies. This can be fathomed that these sides can be not real, so governments have chances to invest in superfluous elements. Apart from it is time consuming for dwellers to investigate issues which do not exist. Therefore, scientists can mainly focus on diverse methods which are essential for lives. As highlight for this point, in some CNN articles, the president of the United States have created some tactics which encourage folks not to pay attention about other planets due to some deleterious facts. Another possibility is that these tents will trigger some problems which relate to relationships between nations. It is apparent that numerous countries deem to be jealous with others so that they will strive their best to be peers with nations. Consequently, nations will probably find ways to prevent others. Indeed, these ideas were demonstrated in the wars between the USA and old Russia. Concretely, these nations did not respect others in innovations of ships. Furthermore, peaceful world will be vanished due to this theme. It is not rejected in some spectacles of frictional stories. By virtue of the fact that other subjects in planets may have different thoughts in comparison with people in this earth, so they will assume that the connections can be assaults.
Vice versa, some folks deem that it is better for human to find ways to other stars. First of all, these tactics will trigger incentives for enhancements of human lives. This means that there will be various inventions from scientists if these spectacles can be encouraged. Aside from that, our globe will be benefited if scientists can exploit new knowledge of some points. Therefore, they can thrive new aspects which connect to diverse sides: the economy or tourism. For instance, following VNN channel, many economists have waited for the successes of outer-space enrichments. As a result, they will gain more scope to improve the tourism destinations. Besides, folks can modify tenets of lives if they can learn some information from references of aliens. It is the best for human to observe or select approaches to skyrocket lives if other planets accept to render some aids. A case in this point, diverse scientists have desired to meet or connect with people in other stars so that they can entail some solutions to deleterious environments in this globe.
In brief, there have been both advantages and drawbacks of this themes due to aforementioned deductions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in brief, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14012738854 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74397881179 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494692144374 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0144070131 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4642857143 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8214285714 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16045008735 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464253524322 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454472562812 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938075576567 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466415657434 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.