Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed when they are used as money-making machines aimed at tourists, other people believe that it is the only way to save such conditions in the world today. Discuss both views and give your own opinions
It is true that the idea of whether the cultural traditions turning to money-making tools directed to visitors is the way to deteriorate remains controversy. In my opinion, this has both advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, traditional cultures and their derivatives may face the fate of extinction when customs are regarded as tourist orientation. It is inevitable to provoke some loss of a part of cultural traditions because the craftsmen or practitioners considerably change the old and classic conventions into the new and modern ones. As a result, those traditions which are not favored by the tourists and the commercial market are more likely to be replaced and abandoned gradually. Moreover, they are not purely traditional anymore due to fashion elements addition with the aim of attracting more tourists. Therefore, cultural traditions can not be kept in original form.
On the other hand, tourist orientation would be the most realistic way to save these cultures. Tourist-oriented nature is more likely to provide a grant for some organizations which give salary to the craftspeople and practitioners, it sounds the best to simulate them work harder and efficiently. If craftsmen do not try their best to protect cultural traditions, they can not support their daily lives and gain the motivation to keep doing the job. Furthermore, if what related to tradition, culture do not earn some financial aids, they will be more likely to be destroyed by nature and have no money for refurbishing. Therefore, it would be disappeared someday in the future.
Comments
There is no denying the fact…
There is no denying the fact that the phenomenon of promoting the tourism for economic boosting is ubiquitous across the globe due to its paramount important. One school of thought opine that it is worthless, however others consider that a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits, yet numerous demerits are also there which will be elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits, the most significant advantage is, plenty of job opportunities would be open for young people across the country such as Hotels, resorts, Museum, monuments. Along with it, seasonal street vendors are also benefited from tourists. To cite an example, when visiting china, we can pick up many dresses and other crafts with less costs from local suppliers which shows their cultural characteristics. As a result, it could have an opportunity to earn and survive the family of poor people of nation which promote visitors from other country although there are many countries depending their primary revenue from tourists.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well. First and foremost, destruction of cultural identities. For an instance, traditional and religious peoples lost their cultural values because of influence of western culture in young generations of India. Due to that there is an explicit break between elderly and young people of villages in India. Secondly, western countries facing an issue of illegal activities of migrants which had come into the country as a tourist. Consequently, law and order of such country is the concern of respective authority.
To conclude, without any doubt, this is a mixed bag. If this topic has many positives, then the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25691699605 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17468820367 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6491835035 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222863945213 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765574424088 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394585394887 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141452496877 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120518493194 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.