Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve it. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Ecological hazards are too big to be managed by an individual group or society. Presently, some people are of the opinion that imposing tax on the companies is the most reliable way to curtail air contamination. By contrast, others have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view. First and foremost, companies are expected to use eco friendly energy sources if they are charged for the amount of pollution caused during manufacturing. To illustrate, corporates will definitely look for alternative or auto renewable fuels such as C.N.G, wind power, solar energy and bio gas in order to prevent from heavy levy. Companies may avert the excessive usage of petrol, diesel and wood that result into a high volume of air pollution. Besides this, the efficient usage of fuels and energy efficient machines may come into existence as a part of strategy to control air pollution. Thus, the level of air pollution is likely to plunge under the implementation of tax. On the contrary, opposite wind is also there.
Numerous points can be mentioned to endorse the latter view. Initially, nowadays, a remarkable contribution in the rise of air pollution is made by private cars and other vehicles. Therefore, people must avoid the excessive usage of private vehicles, instead should prefer to use public transport. What is more, discouraging deforestation, excessive consumerism and the usage of non biodegradable things could be lucrative to restrain this issue.
From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, taxing commercial sectors can play a key role to diminish air contamination. However, the importance of other alternatives cannot be underestimated. It is advisable for both people and companies to share joint responsibilities to take over this worrying concern.
To recapitulate, air pollution has become a global menace in this fast paced world. Thus, proactive steps ought to be taken to 'nip this evil in the bed'.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The essay topic only asked 'Discuss both views and give your opinion.', so the last paragraph is not necessary.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1663 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.024 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.933 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.762 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.202 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.476 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.253 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.488 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.025 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...ive or auto renewable fuels such as C.N.G, wind power, solar energy and bio gas i...
^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of fuels and energy efficient machines may come into existence as a part of str...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24012158055 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04322266106 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629179331307 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0106203085 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0952380952 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181001746773 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489060576376 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551381885498 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948541421795 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451611333344 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.