Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people assume that it is unnecessary for employers to comment on how their employees dress to workplace since work quality is what should be prioritized. In my opinion, I totally support this statement as what employers should pay attention to is not an insignificant matter such as employees’ clothes.
To begin with, when employers are too critical of how their workers dress to work, employees somehow cannot produce the desired productivity since they only care about dressing to please the bosses’ eyes instead. Thus, whenever they meet their bosses, they will always go for adjusting their clothes or hair to suit the employers’ preference to not be criticized because of unprofessional appearances. This means that the quality of work is underestimated since workers only care about dressing to please bosses instead of focusing on working effectively, which can directly affect work quality. If employers’s priority is employees’ attire, the main purpose of working might become meaningless.
Moreover, instead of employees’ fashion choices, what employers should be concerned about are work environment and employees’ work competence instead. These factors are decisive to a better work productivity and work outcomes. When working in a friendly environment where employees and bosses cooperate to learn and progress, the quality of work can be improved significantly. Furthermore, employers should be paying attention to their employees’ abilities at work. Even if their employees are well-dressed but incompetent for the occupation, their contributions prove futile for the development of a business.
In conclusion, I believe that employees’ ways of dressing is not what employers should take into consideration. However, they should be attentive to establish a friendly workplace and employ competent people to improve work productivity to strengthen their business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tile for the development of a business. In conclusion, I believe that employees’...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71830985915 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23750707997 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538732394366 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3951308078 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443640803952 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176292402198 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724427677074 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306112874544 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523689616339 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.