Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children. What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
A dispute about whether a father or mother should be paid by the government to take care of their kids at home has been increasingly popular. The benefits of this rule are the fact that children be brought-up better and parents can save more money. However, children will not be able to interact with other youngsters, which in turn lead to psychological drawbacks.
To begin with, offsprings can definitely mature well if one of their parents looks after them. The primary reason is quite straightforward: kids tend to follow their parents rather than somebody they do not know. In addition, there is no need to pay for the child-minding services anymore, so some money can be used for other purposes instead. For example, in my country, I have noticed that children who grow under their parents’ supervision are able to differentiate between a good and a bad deed in their early ages. Hence, it is evident that the abovementioned law is a great idea.
Nonetheless, there are still possible dangerous risks. If children are confined in their homes with their parents all the time, they will rarely have a chance to spend quality time together with their friends. As a result, their social abilities are gradually downgraded since they cannot develop sufficient interpersonal skills. According to my observations, many infants who stay at home with their parents 85% of the time have a significant tough time at communicating with their peers. Authorities, therefore, must weight cautiously the grave impacts of such regulation.
In conclusion, this essay discussed some advantages and disadvantages of restricting children to be looked after by one of their parents. On one hand, parents are freed from after-school childcare costs and children could also mature better. On the other hand, children’s cognitive abilities are vulnerable of damages since they have no time to socialize.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21172638436 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01274582697 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612377850163 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4609741651 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319378325556 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975605947466 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829451565302 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199555158684 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520999558177 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.