Some people think that the government should spend more money on public services than public arts.
To what extent do you agree?
There are those who contend that more government budget should be poured into public service than public arts. In my opinion, while an on-going financial investment on public service should be consistent, public arts should receive attention accordingly as it can boost the quality of life as well as play an intrinsic role in building national identity.
Beginning with the view that the government's financial support should keep focusing on public service, it is definitely proved by the press with a myriad of news reported on social crisis resulted from low-standard public service such as education, security or social welfare. An illustrative example for this is criminality, which is prevailing intensively in inner-city area rife with poverty and a lack of schooling, especially in urban areas, where a combination of large population crammed together in a limited space with insufficient security. Aside from law-breakers arising from poor education and security, there is an inclination of slums due to little social welfare established to help the poor, ill or elderly people. Therefore, the government should Scrutinize an option of increasing more charitable organization to reach all areas suffering from aforementioned social issues!
Turning to an alternative viewpoint, public arts are deemed as a tremendous role in the national identity. In other words, it has profound impact on citizen's thoughts and customs, which lead to a vibrant society of a country. Taking the Chinese civilization as an example, all famous China dynasties are often viewed as the length of the Great Wall, and these periods were equivocally characterized by numerous historical sites. Besides, public arts can create a desirable and beautiful environment of residents' everyday life with objects around the home that have positive impact on their well-being, particularly psychological one. Many of great cities of the world that are famous for their signature public arts such as Eiffel tower, Statue of Liberty, which are enjoyed by both locals and tourists.
In conclusion, both pubic service and public arts should receive equal investment from the government budget in order to balance the quality as well as the beauty of a city or country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | ChuKatee232903 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | ChuKatee232903 | 84 | view |
- Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 81
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD FOLLOW THE TRADITIONS OF THE SOCIETY WHILE OTHER PEOPLE THINK THAT YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD BE FREE TO BEHAVE AS INDIVIDUALS DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
- Governments should focus on spending only on public services not wasting on the arts To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the government should spend more money on public services than public arts To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...an public arts. In my opinion, while an on-going financial investment on public service ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...ls and tourists. In conclusion, both pubic service and public arts should receive ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94203655557 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7906357852 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.545454545 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9090909091 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248449313661 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103355479178 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994959347078 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174164911581 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819076659893 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.