Some people think that the government should spend more money on public services than public arts.
To what extent do you agree with this statement.
Some contend that more government budget should be poured into public service than public arts. In my opinion, while an on-going financial investment in public service should be consistent, public arts should receive attention as it can boost the quality of life as well as play an intrinsic role in building a national identity.
Beginning with the view that the government's financial support should keep focusing on public service, it is proved by the press with a myriad of news reported on social crisis resulted from low-standard public services such as education, security or social welfare. An illustrative example of this is criminality, which is prevailing intensively in areas rife with insufficient security and a lack of schooling, especially in undeveloped cities or countries. Aside from law-breakers arising from poor education and security, there is an inclination of slums due to little social welfare established to help the poor, ill and elderly people. Therefore, the government should scrutinise an option of increasing more charitable organizations to reach all areas suffering from the aforementioned social issues!
Turning to an alternative viewpoint, public arts are should be equally invested. Public arts can create a desirable and peculiar environment. Many of the great cities of the world are famous for their signature public arts such as the Eiffel Tower, Statue of Liberty, which are enjoyed by both locals and tourists. In other words, arts have a profound impact on preserving national identities. Besides, vibrant societies almost always have a tolerant and unique arts community. For example, the Tang and Song dynasties are often viewed as being the height of Chinese civilization and these periods were characterized by their arts such as poems, music and architecture. Similarly, when art and innovation were restricted during the Ming dynasty, Chinese civilisation fell into decline.
In conclusion, both public service and public arts should receive equal investment from the government budget in order to balance the quality as well as the beauty of a city or country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | ChuKatee232903 | 84 | view |
- Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 81
- Some people think that the government should spend more money on public services than public arts To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Governments should focus on spending only on public services not wasting on the arts To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...an public arts. In my opinion, while an on-going financial investment in public service ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4303030303 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94329637857 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9564137951 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306628115061 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11338010874 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098849688863 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204134250115 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663416490053 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.