-Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our achievements.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Throughout human existence, human has discovered many things. These discoveries were based on nature and old people lived many experience for it. Actually, nowadays we use knowledge, which existed from these discoveries, and people notice it mostly. Therefore, these discoveries were a journey from ignorance to knowledge, but it do not show that ancient cultures’ knowledge invaluable because it can be believed that ignorance means inadequate knowledge in old times and with in time people has developed these initial information.
On the one hand, if people look the history, they may surprise, because all the those developments started from initial and zero experience and they has become permanent in humanity history. For instance, old people did not know antidote of snake poison and maybe million people died until find the antidote for it. And also, it published about how people defend themselves against snake poison. Thus, this is journey of the knowledge against ignorance.
On the other hand, all the initial information were not sufficient mostly and they should be evolved. Honestly, beginner knowledges were necessary for these developments. For example, people needed experiences, which caused many deaths, for improving antidote vaccine. Well, can we say that people, who discovered beginner knowledges, were ignorant ? Of course not, because their achievements and experiences were gold value for journey of the knowledges throughout history.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that, many knowledges existed from dangerous experiences, because of this reason, ancient cultures and people deserve respect for their beginner knowledge, but we should know that this was story of knowledge from darkness to brightness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much experience', 'a good deal of experience'.
Suggestion: much experience; a good deal of experience
...re based on nature and old people lived many experience for it. Actually, nowadays we use knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...ney from ignorance to knowledge, but it do not show that ancient cultures' kn...
^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...om initial and zero experience and they has become permanent in humanity history. F...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, honestly, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62453531599 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82843924932 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557620817844 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0984329759 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195421642923 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685060656814 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444078341334 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128431832763 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507218753434 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.