Technologies in modern world has replaced many human tasks, and has created ease in operations, there are numerous positive aspects offered by technologies, but as it is commonly said, "A coin has two sides to it", same is referred here. Professionals of different fields has raised a question on how intensive use of technology, weakens the reading, writing skills of children. It is commonly agreed that students these days makes use of gadgets for their education which in return limits reading and writing quality. The aspect of memory power and reading, writing speed and time spent on technology and its effects both together will prove this.
Firstly, as we all are surrounded by technology and gadgets, its use becomes almost un- negligible. For example, every information is available online, so physically reading a book is affected and use of typing is more than writing which affects the overall memory power of the child as well as lessens the speed to do the task. Unfortunately, parents these days do not understand this, and don't stop children from using gadgets extensively. Hence, it could be said how getting dependent on gadgets can ultimately prove to be a stopage in the growth of student.
Secondly, plethora schools these days have adopted the idea of online assigning homework, these tasks to be performed by students on computers, such situation adds fuel to the concern, as well as increases infants time spent on screens. For instance, an average student might spent 2-3 hours a day in front of screen, in such scenerio using gadgets to complete educational work will increase number of hours all together, which isn't advisable. Undoubtedly, responsible parents are preaching this idea of how kid could spend less hours on mobile, laptops and reasons of this advice. Thus, it is clear why spending more time on technologies will hinder reading and writing skills in infants.
In summary, negative sides of use of technologies are weigher than positive in the case of students. Thus, it is clear why traditional way of education has to be carried where children has to compulsory read books and write physically should be incorporated. After analysing this subject it is predicted that parents will stop their children from using technologies intensively, for their own betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... these days do not understand this, and dont stop children from using gadgets extens...
^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ase number of hours all together, which isnt advisable. Undoubtedly, responsible par...
^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...aching this idea of how kid could spend less hours on mobile, laptops and reasons of this ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...aching this idea of how kid could spend less hours on mobile, laptops and reasons of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175066313 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80122427384 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559681697613 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0656702797 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.066666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14943368282 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550284824922 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324809177409 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959275582495 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141059669204 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.