Traffic is the ever growing problem faced by metropolitan cities. Even traffic control bodies are rigorously building rules to control traffic and improve transport issues between urban and rural regions. It is commonly disagreed that to minimize city traffics, people should migrate from village to city. Analyzing both the impact on population rate due to people shifting to cities and migration leading to curb the growth of transport system which is majorly evolving to create better connection between suburbs and city will prove this.
Firstly, due to urbanization cities are already facing over population problems in such scenario adding people in the name of solving traffic problems will be a stupid path. For instance, metro city Mumbai in India, is highly populated adding to which small town youth migrates to Mumbai in search of employment opportunities, due to which traffic situation reaches its peak demanding a strict system to be followed. Unfortunately, people does not understand this directly relevant issue of population with traffic and blames the traffic police on mismanagement. Hence, it is proved why encouraging people to live in the city does not work effectively to regulate traffic.
Secondly, road transport services is continuously working on improving traffic situation through out cities. For example, BRTS development i.e. bus rapid transit system has created networks in the city areas and links between villages too. Unfortunately, countryside people are preferring to move in cities as they are unaware about the new projects which will definitely improve road links in the upcoming time. Thus, it is believed that though living far in suburbs people will be able to commute easily as a result of new developments in road building which will not force them to live their home town and start living in the city.
In summary, positive sides of improvement in traffic and transport problems are visible. Thus, it is clear that migration from rural to urban will add flame to the fire of traffic. After analyzing this subject it is predicted that the most opted way to stop traffic and transport issues will be focusing on new schemes and development in road industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... working on improving traffic situation through out cities. For example, BRTS development i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... too. Unfortunately, countryside people are preferring to move in cities as they are unaware a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71572817972 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4255868787 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246094594258 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919592803526 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405343076938 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155510608353 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285121094935 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.