The best way to deal with rising problem of traffic and transportation is by encouraging people to live in cities rather than in suburbs and countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that problems related to traffic and transportation can be eradicated if people settle down in cities from countryside areas. However, I think it will multiply the issue rather than resolving it. Urbanization brings a lot more traffic problems to cities because of increase in urban population, more transport services are required to facilitate people.
Urbanization means there will be more vehicles in cities as people from different age groups will need them to move around. In order to complete their tasks and responsibilities, residents of cities require vehicles like cars and buses, for instance, to carry out their jobs, education, and festivals. This will augment the traffic congestion on roads instead of decreasing it. In addition, if urbanization will speed up, urban area will expand for sure which means further development of infrastructure will be required. This development of roads and housing will burden existing roads. Heavy Lorries, for example, loaded with construction materials can cause chaotic situation in old parts of cities. Therefore, encouraging people to settle down in urban areas will produce counter results.
Notwithstanding the idea of urbanization, I think rural and countryside area should be developed both economically and physically. If employment opportunities were provided there, inhabitants of those areas would not travel to cities to seek jobs. This would reduce demand of more buses and taxis from transportation sector. Also, as long as these areas are equipped with facilities like schools, colleges, parks, entertainment sources, people would not visit cities time and again. By reducing number of trips, transport needs can be easily fulfilled and traffic crowding will not be seen in cities.
To conclude, after transforming suburbs in self-sufficient commercial and industrial hubs, traffic and transport based issues can be solved in already existed cities. Whereas, encouraging people to shift to cities from suburbs will amplify the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an be solved in already existed cities. Whereas, encouraging people to shift to cities ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62540716612 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03709554109 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1183860401 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.588235294 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163001841974 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586158832946 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476395673738 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124289610436 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549403095685 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.