Traffic problem in the cities are increasing day by day. Many people thinks that the best way to solve these traffic issues is by making more space in the city to accommodate people from suburbs. I do not agree with this statement, as urban areas are already over crowded, and it would be wise to start providing job opportunities on the countryside.
One of the major problem in the city is the traffic congestion. As most of the people nowadays own their personal vehicle, and prefer to travel to and from work at their own convenience, this has resulted to an increase in the number of vehicles on the road causing traffic jams. This roadblocks are majorly caused by people coming from the outskirts of the city. So in order to overcome this situation, many suggests that people living in the suburbs should move to the city to avoid travelling. However, this do not help the situation, as the cities are Rural areas are already over crowded. It is difficult to accommodate more people there.
In order to combat this over crowding situation, a better solution is to create job opportunities for people living on the countryside. As, by doing so, travelling in and out of the center point by the commuters will be limited. This might help to curb the traffic problem to some extent. Many cities became big cities by expanding its area and providing development opportunities to the suburbs area near them. This helps to increase the city size as well.
In conclusion, as the traffic in the city center is majorly contributed by commuters from the countryside. So, instead of shifting these travelers from the suburbs to cities, a better option is to create good job prospects for them in the countryside itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suburbs'' or 'suburb's'?
Suggestion: suburbs'; suburb's
...viding development opportunities to the suburbs area near them. This helps to increase ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80471380471 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69148906973 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6618002273 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23637313659 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848792544247 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440485572446 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154369639989 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503373410441 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.