Online shopping applications and websites have gained a lot of attention recently. More and more people prefer to buy things online rather than visiting shops or stores. As the service providers offers free delivery and exchange policies, it has resulted into more environmental damage due to increase of carbon footprint. Also, because of such practice unemployment has struck the market, as many big stores had to cut down manpower to compensate their loss in business.
With the advent of technology, online shopping is made easy. So instead of going to the store, people often prefer to buy things online that is delivered to them at their doorstep. All these online sites provides their customer with free deliveries as well as cost free exchange policies, to which people often misuse. This can be said as sometimes people make multiple number of small order instead of one single order. Secondly, when buying clothes online, people tend to buy two different size of a particular outfit, and then return the unfit one. This leads to more damage to the environment in terms of carbon emission by the vehicles used to provide at home deliveries.
On the other hand, such online stores do not need any work force, due to which a lot of job opportunities have been cut down. Also, the big stores or malls that were able to provide employment to hundreds of people, but because of this online trend many stores had been shut down due to loss in business. And, therefore lot of jobs are lost. Even though these online service providers needs delivery person, but the number of people required are limited and have certain criteria which do not benefit a lot of labour workers. For example, to work as a delivery man, a person has needs to have his own a vehicle.
In conclusion, even though online shopping save a lot of time of people. The disadvantages that it has on the environment will affect our survival in a long run. And, the unemployment is making more people jobless affecting the nations economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e delivery and exchange policies, it has resulted into more environmental damage ...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...aking more people jobless affecting the nations economy.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84927536232 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54702300578 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542028985507 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1765944864 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9444444444 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209472948989 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689850777715 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400690340486 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127518248363 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175729999431 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.