Fast food industry has gained a lot of popularity in last few years. Many people fear its negative impact . As, consumption of fast food affects an individual's health due to high content of preservatives. Plastic packing of the food products contributes to the waste generated and is affecting our surrounding and lastly, it has badly affected the eating habits of an entire family. I totally agree with the above mentioned statements.
People are attracted towards fast food because of its easy to make and is delicious to mouth. Today in fast paced life, it gets difficult for working people to cook proper meals, so most of the time they rely on such junk food. This helps them to save some time for themselves. A survey conducted by Economic Times stated that the sale of fast food products peaks during office lunch hours. Even though it is convenient, the long term effect of consuming junk food are deleterious.
There are many disadvantages related to fast food consumption. First, these food have zero nutritional value, and are fully loaded with calories. Apart from this, it contains preservatives that are harmful to the body. So eating junk food have been reported to relate to obesity, diabetes and cardiac problems. Second, as these food items are packed in a plastic wrapper, with the increasing demand for such food, the total non degradable waste produced will damage the environment to a great extent. For example, Ahmedabad municipal corporation recently reported that plastic waste from food products contributed 78 %of total waste generation.
Lastly, lack of time to prepare food has led people to eat junk food. As nowadays both parents are working and they do not have time to prepare food for themselves as well as for children. So, this situation has led to a habit of eating outside, and it is affecting the health of entire family. So it becomes necessary to find alternative ways to eat healthy food in order to avoid future health related complications.
In conclusion, lot of health problems can be avoided when healthy eating habits are instill within a family. Also, environmental damage control can also be made by limiting packaged food products. So, even though fast food is easily made and is available at a cheap price, its negative impact shall not be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rs. Many people fear its negative impact . As, consumption of fast food affects an...
^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Many people fear its negative impact . As, consumption of fast food affects an in...
^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...As, consumption of fast food affects an individuals health due to high content of preservat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...elated to fast food consumption. First, these food have zero nutritional value, and are fu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'instilled'.
Suggestion: instilled
... avoided when healthy eating habits are instill within a family. Also, environmental da...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, so, still, well, apart from, as for, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67507637744 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2036748393 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9130434783 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7826086957 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297152250125 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082553445744 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04193152092 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165070466108 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489993522999 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.