Nowadays media uses a lot of photograph to highlight particular stories on channels or newspapers. Many people are of the opinion that this way of communicating news seems more effective on the readers rather than write up alone. I believe, an image have a tendency to attract eyes, and if an individual finds the image interesting, than they will end up reading that article. However, sometimes media disguises readers by showing a totally irrelevant photo for an article.
Media nowadays have developed a way to attract their readers to read their articles. Due to tough competition among multiple News providers, it has become difficult stay the choice of people. So in order to create interesting articles, these media people have started putting up images related to that article. A study showed that majority of people will ignore a piece of information with write up alone, and on the contrary, if that same information is highlighted with a picture relevant to the write up, most of the people will go through it.
On the other hand, some News publishers take advantage of this scenario, and fool their readers. This can be said as there has been many cases where some image is displayed along with the article, but the written part is totally irrelevant to the image. So, in order to attract more people to see or read their news, such fake marketing stunts are being performed by B graded news providers. So, one should know the genuine news channels and papers and save their time, rather than reading misguided information generated by fake people.
In conclusion, images definitely attract people and help the writer to pass the message or the story to number of people. However, some people create fake images to seek attention of the people, so readers should not fall in to the trap created by such people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun photograph seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of photographs'.
Suggestion: a lot of photographs
Nowadays media uses a lot of photograph to highlight particular stories on chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... highlighted with a picture relevant to the write up, most of the people will go through ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91612903226 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58459375336 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3848477097 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17572616555 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620106951052 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547567654802 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104258785154 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026700683021 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.