Many people argue that a lot of job applicants are asked to provide their personal information including their hobbies and their marital status to their employer which is totally irrelevant. Whereas others opine that this information could be useful. I believe, personal details help the hiring authority to have a background check of the candidate, however this information should not misused as a reason for rejecting or selecting the candidate.
Nowadays a lot of companies recruiting commitee asks for their employees personal details to have a greater understanding of their likes and dislikes as well as their priorities. People who are married and have a family to look out for will have a better chance of getting hired, as they have a sense of responsibility. For instance, survey conducted by Times job stated that majority of companies prefer to offer a top position to a Family Man or Woman. Also, knowing hobbies or interests of an employee helps a company to encourage productivity of their staff by organizing sporting events or an outing trips.
On the other hand, some times sharing personal information can prove to be detrimental for the employees. In India, a lot of companies rejects unmarried females, as they think they might leave the city or a country aftter getting married. Regardless of their qualification female candidates often have to face denial from companies. So under such circumstances, one loses a chance to accomplish their career prospect. Such selection criteria should be discourages and it is really important to speak up against such biased mentality.
In conclusion, many times personal information helps a company to organize various events that can act as a refreshment for their employees. Also, knowing the sense of maturity and responsibility can help one to get a good position. However, the companies using these information as a opportunity to reject a candidate based on their marital status needs to be discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r employer which is totally irrelevant. Whereas others opine that this information coul...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'misuse'
Suggestion: misuse
...te, however this information should not misused as a reason for rejecting or selecting ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... position. However, the companies using these information as a opportunity to reject a candidate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he companies using these information as a opportunity to reject a candidate based...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, really, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 937.175257732 177% => OK
No of words: 318.0 206.0 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02020410681 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 290.88556701 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4295025555 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 4.34317383033 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323702337944 0.216113520407 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104208752876 0.0766984524023 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681259403531 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201685581395 0.12726935374 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639646839281 0.0580467560999 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 41.2886597938 237% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.