Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobiles phones in communication has negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. Agree or disagree
The skills related to writing and reading has always condemned as crucial tools in communication. Many afraid that, however, the popular use of computers and mobiles phones in daily interaction would hamper these skills. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this that will be discussed below.
The popularity of technological gadgets, on the one hand, could lead to a drop in people’s writing and reading ability for several reasons. First, it is a norm that given the advanced and sophisticated features in apps such as Facebook, young people tend to abbreviate their words or even send stickers only to deliver their messages. This habit, in the long run, would ruin young’s capability to use grammar, punctuality, vocabulary appropriately. Another fact to note is that the constant messages and notifications received lead users in a flow of chatting and replying all time. They thus have no time left to gain knowledge related to reading and writing skills as well as practice them.
The use of hi-tech gadgets is detrimental, but it is not to say that users have no chances to improve these skills through cell phones and computers. A lot of cutting-edge apps or websites nowadays, correct an essay within several seconds, giving users more chances to use the language more appropriately. Furthermore, given the global connection, people could use phones or computers to discuss over a given topic with people in a lot of forums. As a result, they would improve their writing skills when finding ways to make their words understandable as well as have ability to analyze and read others opinions.
To recap, it seems to me that the use of technology is beneficial, provided that people find appropriate environment in which they can practice their skills. Otherwise, the convenient and distracting features of these equipment could make users less likely to read and write well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 213, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
... convenient and distracting features of these equipment could make users less likely to read an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15015974441 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88507778321 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4031652447 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256635369834 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823762300781 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591726243265 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154822939822 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127943524851 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.