Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it
The problem of global warming has obviously come to the fore in recent decades due to its substantial impacts on human life. Although the proposal of coexistence between climate change and humankind appears legitimate, it could be deemed an imminent threat to the earth’s future.
It is evidently true that climate change has a detrimental influence on human’s development. First the environmental consequences of rising in temperature especially natural disasters could be a hindrance to countries’economic growth. For example the intensity and frequency of floods and tropical super storms could potentially hamper the process of agriculture cultivation and goods trade, leading to an increase in poverty rate and decrease in relief operation. Secondly due to the devastating effect of pollution stemming from fumes emissions and combustions, people’s health is likely to be put in jeopardy. This means that individuals can take the risk of irreversible respiratory diseases such as lung cancer or tuberculosis, which inevitably shorten their life expectancy.
The coexistence of human and climate change is invariably associated with the destruction of ecosystem . The first impact is that rising in temperature is proven to be conductive to habitat loss in animal. For example due to the melting of glaciers and ice caps in North Pole, polar bear species are currently on the brink of extinction as there is no permanent habitat for them to survive. Secondly pollution can affect adversely on the growth of trees especially the process of photosynthesis. Therefore it can be implied that if the dysfunction of this process happened, humankind could all disappear due to the deterioration of oxygen quality.
In conclusion, actively combating global warming must be regarded as top priority given the high urgency. Governments and citizens worldwide should address the problem and take steps to reduce the effect of climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe. Although the proposal of coexistence between climate change and humankind app...
^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al consequences of rising in temperature especially natural disasters could be a ...
^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ciated with the destruction of ecosystem . The first impact is that rising in temp...
^^
Line 6, column 497, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pecially the process of photosynthesis. Therefore it can be implied that if the dysfuncti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ency. Governments and citizens worldwide should address the problem and take step...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58528428094 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2979724411 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1533638986 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057407747088 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221259632314 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341920676335 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0371742326758 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132502906897 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.