In recent years, the way of improving intelligence has been gaining a great deal of attention throughout the world. Most importantly, it has been a bone of contention among neuroscientists and other experts regarding the measures on how one can improve his or her intelligence. While some people consider intelligence as a by born concept, however, I would contend that it can be upgraded by other means as well.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that there are some people born with great intelligence which comes from their parents. As a result, scientists always consider genetics to be the prime precursor for becoming talented. Therefore, a lot of research has been carried out in different parts of the world that explains a strong correlation of innate genetics to the talents of a person. In an empirical survey conducted by London’s Psychiatric Association in 2019 depicts the same notion. In their survey, it is found that more than 89% of the subjects showed higher cognitive skills and other improved brain functions who belonged to their meritorious parents. This undeniably proves that intelligence is mostly an innate issue of a person.
Conversely, there are other experts who say, talents can be developed over time. It means that the environment, the surroundings as well as the mental exercise through which a person goes, actually, shapes his brain capacity to troubleshoot different things. This can be exemplified by a recent study done in Canada. In 2020, the government of Canada conducted a trial where more than 5,000 children were given certain kinds of brain exercise along with their regular study curriculum. At the end of that 6-months study, they have shown better intelligence than the other kids of the same school. So this reflects a possibility that we can improve it with certain brain learning procedures.
To recapitulate, this debate will continue among different levels. Personally, I believe genetics is a precursor, but not the ultimate way to be intelligent. The other factors like the learning from the surroundings play a pivotal role in this process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15160349854 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95611008139 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559766763848 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2994224296 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186523567176 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555691781865 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511925383245 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11011229783 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529163960781 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.