Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems and it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, rapid industrialization is gaining a great deal of attention around the world. Surprisingly, it has become a bone of contention among the critics regarding its role, either it is eliminating poverty or it is exacerbating the environmental hazards. While some people consider detering industrial growth may help in sorting out the pollution, however, I would contend that industrialization is a sine qua non for fighting with poverty.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that in developing countries, the industries are growing without proper plan. As a result, waste management procedures are not being followed strictly and the environment pollution happens detrimentally. Furthermore, the industrialists are not following the Environmental Protection Acts at all. Therefore, it is posing huge health hazards to the mankind. For instance, the rapid growth of garments industries are contributing to the economy of Bangladesh, but on the other side, it is damaging the air as well as water quality irreversibly.
Conversely, for any developing country, the industrialization creates a lot of job opportunities to the unemployed people. Hence, poverty can be wiped out easily and livability index will be raised. In addition, with the increased industrial expansion, the economy will be smooth-running for any country. Consequently, the GDP will be raised due to increased cash flow to the country. The RMG sectors in Bangladesh, for example, contributing a lot in economy as well as it is reversing the extreme poverty for the last few decades.
All things considered, stopping industrialization cannot be a proper approach for handling environmental crisis. Personally, I believe, further in the future, the government should give more emphasis on industrial expansion, provided that environmental laws are implemented and practiced strictly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detrimental manner" with adverb for "detrimental"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y and the environment pollution happens in a detrimental manner. Furthermore, the industrialists are no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an irreversible manner" with adverb for "irreversible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...maging the air as well as water quality in an irreversible manner. Conversely, for any developing coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, furthermore, hence, however, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56944444444 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5147396862 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.10727042 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23764075775 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674279428363 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589721111169 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138997720284 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468036923153 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.