Numerous individuals believe that studying in a group at school can bring more effectiveness, whereas some argue that students can get better results when studying by themselves. From my perspective, I do think both views are reasonable as each has its own merits.
There is a common belief that it is effective for students to study in a group. The first reason for this statement is that learners can improve their communication abilities. It is apparent that working in a group requires teammates to communicate with others to complete their group project or presentation. As a result, keeping verbal conversations can help students interact effectively. In addition, in-group studying can give students a chance to cultivate their own character. For example, when sharing ideas and knowledge within a group, individuals have to educate themselves on how to listen to and respect others' points of view, so it is obviously a positive evolution.
On the other hand, it is immutably true to believe that students can choose self-education to get better study results. Initially, learners can avoid unexpected conflicts. It is obvious that discussion with groupmates may cause verbal disagreement because everyone has their own opinions, and sometimes it is knotty to balance them all. Besides, another benefit is that studying alone is a great way to build students' ability to be independent. Studying without any support makes them arrange their time, approach references, and make plans by themselves. It is undoubtedly a beneficial long-term development of their personality.
To sum up, there are various arguments when discussing problems relating to studying alone or in a group. However, I believe that the methods are all vital as they bring positive aspects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, may, so, whereas, for example, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35357142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0502906352 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.893635003 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359447443155 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106438161957 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892895256812 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207445315464 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750292217717 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.