Some people think it is more important for the government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is regularly argued that the governments are expected to spend a huge amount of the national budget addressing these health problems and promote citizens to live more active, it is the best way rather than spend it on those who have been ill. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this statement, any citizens have an equal in human lives.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why people claim that national spending is spent on promoting people have a healthy lifestyle. In the first place, annually, a large amount of carbon dioxide is discharged by factories or vehicles, which contributes to residents and animals coping with an abundance of diseases, such as pneumonia. Thus, by investing money in preventing types of gas toxic from being discharged into the environment, which offers the atmosphere becomes unpolluted and people could enjoy fresh air that does not have any problems. In addition, deforestation is a matter in many places in the world, it makes residents plenty of risks to dealing with illness. Therefore, the government makes full use of its power to deter and impose heavy fines on those who cut down trees.
On the other hand, I believe that the governments are expected to invest money in those who have infected ill. One reason for this trend could be that anyone has equal to each other and the infected person too. In fact, they have contributed to the economy and they are an indispensable part of human life.
To sum up, national funding is supposed to invest in all areas and these infected people are spent money to solve their diseases in order to help the country gradually more development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, in fact, such as, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89679715302 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61559783986 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8335478476 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217933201153 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740877986255 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750096494912 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122415653156 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034245562037 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.