The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The chart illustrates the average household spending on different areas (Housing, Transport, food, health care, and other goods and services in two nations ( Malaysia, and Japan) over the examined period.
It can be clearly seen that the proportion of household expenditures for housing in Malaysia and Japan was the highest while the opposite was true for health care was the lowest in the two countries.
As can be seen in the chart, the health care rates of Japan, which is spent at 6 percent, compared to Malaysia were only just 3 percent. spending on the transport of Malaysia at just 10 percent, half of that on Japan.
Looking at the chart in more detail, Malaysians spent household expenditure on housing reached 34 percent. However, the figure for Japan at just 21 percent. The expenditures for other goods and services of Japan are more than that of Malaysia, with 29 percent and 26 percent respectively.
R
The chart illustrates the average household spending on different areas (Housing, Transport, food, health care, and other goods and services in two nations ( Malaysia, and Japan) over the examined period.
It can be clearly seen that the proportion of household expenditures for housing in Malaysia and Japan was the highest while the opposite was true for health care was the lowest in the two countries.
As can be seen in the chart, the health care rates of Japan, which is spent at 6 percent, compared to Malaysia were only just 3 percent. spending on the transport of Malaysia at just 10 percent, half of that on Japan.
Looking at the chart in more detail, Malaysians spent household expenditure on housing reached 34 percent. However, the figure for Japan at just 21 percent. The expenditures for other goods and services of Japan are more than that of Malaysia, with 29 percent and 26 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other goods and services in two nations Malaysia, and Japan over the examined p...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices in two nations Malaysia, and Japan over the examined period. It can be ...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spending
...d to Malaysia were only just 3 percent. spending on the transport of Malaysia at just 10...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other goods and services in two nations Malaysia, and Japan over the examined p...
^^
Line 10, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices in two nations Malaysia, and Japan over the examined period. It can be ...
^^
Line 14, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spending
...d to Malaysia were only just 3 percent. spending on the transport of Malaysia at just 10...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68026819967 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.275080906149 0.547539520022 50% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2315408266 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254960921202 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132079852689 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410966264052 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1651737332 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305776590227 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.