These days, investing in roads and motorways instead of public transport systems is a common idea for numerous citizens. This option, in many cases, should be more detrimental. To prove this, the reasons are described in the next paragraphs.
Firstly, using public transportation can lessen pollution. The usual representatives of this transportation mode are subways and buses. In fact, by switching from personal vehicles to underground or buses, the number of automobiles operating on roads reduces significantly. This not only leads to a decrease in the amount of emission into the atmosphere and then improves air quality but also reduces the consumption of fossil fuels, which of course is very limited now. Furthermore, using public vehicles is more affordable. The main reason is buses and subways are great choices for people who do not have private vehicles such as motorbikes or cars. For instance, Hue- a city in Viet Nam, allows students to board buses for just 5,000 dongs, regardless of their destination.
Secondly, More space for a huge amount of vehicles, which relieves strain on the city's main roadways, is another reason to promote the expansion of public transportation. In other words, buses and trains can carry a large number of passengers, which helps ease significantly traffic congestion rates during rush hours. For example, according to World Transportation surveys, 30% of workers reach their workplaces on time by using buses.
By way of conclusion, to improve people's lives, funding must be allocated to mass transit, even if the construction and maintenance of roads or lanes for motor vehicles are vital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...other words, buses and trains can carry a large number of passengers, which helps ease significan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, such as, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32567049808 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00171459544 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3688076893 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144847463616 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525085708707 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050851187846 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892725433767 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401678419919 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.