Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree?
It is a widespread practice in these days that traffic networks has become increasingly less efficient due to explosion of population. Some people argue that the importance should be placed on allocating the large amount of money on development of roads and motorways. However I contend that enhancement of public transport systems plays crucial role in addressing problems related to traffic.
On the one hand, It is commonly believed that the investment of roads and motorways may bring benefits on commuters or dwellers in certain areas. The first prominent reason is that the expansion and separation of roads make a great contrubition on alleviating traffic congestion in rush hour. It is not unusual that roads in underdeveloped countries are narrow and low quality, this leads to get stuck in the jam for a handful of hours. Futhermore, driving on same lane among strucks, motorbikes and bicycles is ubiquitous on some disadvataged areas due to restricted investment. The second primary problem is that spending money on equiping warming signs or traffic lights along main streets or avenues might mitigate accidents. For instance, traffic lights is effective way to controlling directions for travellers. If these equipments is inadequate, I can pose a threat on residents joining on the roads.
On the other hand, public transport systems is dispensable part in terms of enhancing traffic efficency oriented environmentally friendly. Initially, the well- constructed public transport systems is more likely to dwinding the number of commuters on the roads. In fact, rising quality of employees use bus or train to come workplaces, this means that it is not only economicial choices but easing burden for the road networks on a regular basis. The another issue that is worthying mention that developing public transport is beneficial on decreasing the amount of carbon dioxide emiting from vehicles. It is common that global warming or climate change are atribute partly to traffic exhaust by burning fossil fuels severving for automatic engines. As a result, huaman beings is able to suffer catastrophic recurcussions from these activities. Thus, sotisphicated public transport may handle some problems involved to traffic emission.
In conclusion, it seems to me that development of roads or motorways is vital part in allevating accidents or risks when driving on the roads. However, I firmly believe that the comprehensive public transport assist to tackling traffic congestion and preserve surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... on development of roads and motorways. However I contend that enhancement of public tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ddressing problems related to traffic. On the one hand, It is commonly believed...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eat on residents joining on the roads. On the other hand, public transport syst...
^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: coming
...g quality of employees use bus or train to come workplaces, this means that it is not o...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems involved to traffic emission. In conclusion, it seems to me that devel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43367346939 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03846556855 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7621371231 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.105263158 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189126074619 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539220332273 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485226589011 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11678584362 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246025512537 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.