Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, specific jobs are better suited to men and others are more suitable for women.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a constant debate between whether some occupational positions accord with men or women. While I believe that two genders have characteristics and each would suite to different types of jobs, I would argue that some specific jobs should not be discriminated between men and women.
To begin with, men and women are advised to work as some specific positions. First of all, although both men and women follow many similar patterns, they still have particular aspects. Men are known for features such as great strength, willingness to do hard work, strongminded and rigid, …. Conversely, women are the more caring person, dexterous and patient, … Consequently, while men are supposed to work as mechanic, engineer, Technological occupations or labor work; sewing work, kindergarten teacher, chief or nurse, … are done by women. Secondly, several positions are required suitable genders as one of the recruiting criteria, for instance, actors in movies, room service, …
However, besides different qualities, plenty of people have old prejudice against sexuality in many jobs. Some of the employers abuse the factors between men and women and have a tendency to think that women do not capable of completing works well, which creates considerable sexual discrimination. For example, only small percentages (25%) are women contribute to a large number of authorities and politics in Vietnam, monumental high-paid jobs and positions are tackled by men and so on. Enormous occupations prefer recruiting men to women.
Overall, although I agree that specific jobs are better suited for each gender, there should be gender equality in many kinds of jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ejudice against sexuality in many jobs. Some of the employers abuse the factors between men...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...percentages 25% are women contribute to a large number of authorities and politics in Vietnam, mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37404580153 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88174763581 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603053435115 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9055171445 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423062639326 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164774487795 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451489482519 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246165076939 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637368345874 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.