Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops, and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The cell phone is one of the most vital inventions in human history and becomes a part of our lives. Although some people argue that government should prohibit people from using mobile phones in public areas because of their negative impacts, I completely disagree with this statement for several reasons.
On the one hand, there are various reasons explained why mobile phones should ban in public areas. The first reason is that sound and light from mobile phones can distract people in particular places such as libraries and stations from focusing on their tasks. For instance, if we are in the library, it is annoying that somebody has a phone call, talks loudly, and receives notifications noises. As a result, it prevents us from devoting worthy time to reading and researching documents. Moreover, a phone is an object that thief targets so banning using mobile phones is a reasonable way to protect your personal property.
Despite the pernicious effects of using mobile phones in public areas, we cannot deny the crucial reasons for bringing a phone with us every time. Firstly, using a cell phone is a way to relax when you wait for something for a long time. For example, you feel tired taking hours of long trips so you can enjoy some relaxing music to relieve stress on your phone by using your earphones which avoid interrupting other people. In addition, its functions are helpful in several situations. Mobile phones can save lives as emergency services can easily locate you when you call.
In conclusion, although usage phones might be a distraction in public spaces, I believe the experience of users in public places is more vital. Therefore, service operators should invest in researching user behavior to develop more useful apps.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99658703072 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5295743983 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7410624017 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289510615815 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09782761963 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763399958637 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18132794851 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214036722355 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.