Some people think that modern technology making people more sociable while others think that it is making them less sociable.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the globalised world, the modern technology influencing the people in different ways as it is helpful to bring them closer to each other. Nevertheless, some mortals arguing that the gap between social interactions is increasing with technology.
To begin with, there is no doubt that science and technology has huge impact on the relationships of the human species. Generally speaking, the technology provides the plethora of social sites such as Facebook, Whatsapp and Twitter etcetera by which the individuals remains in the contact of their relatives and friends. Furthermore, they can also find companions by using social applications who are living in different parts of the world. To illustrate, I also find one of the best age mate on Facebook who is from america and honestly very supportive to me. Apart from the above consideration, many people whose relatives are residing in western countries are making regular contact with them with the help of internet and feel that they are not far away from them. Hence, technology is playing major role to make mankind much sociable.
On the downside, civilization argue that the birth of technology has negative impact on the social relationships. As everyone is feeling comfortable to link others on different apps and showing that they have not enough time to visit their near and deers. In this way, the face to face interaction is decreasing day by day. Moreover, the children of modern age do not know their relatives personally and in my opinion ethical and social values among themselves would also decreases. Consequently, the public would not be much respectful as others who interacts by personal meetings.
In conclusion, my view is that where technology is beneficial to make social contact, but, however its cons should not be overlooked as the personal interaction is most important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...cial values among themselves would also decreases. Consequently, the public would not be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, honestly, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, apart from, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18272425249 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91762454306 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3800824611 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164019497207 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053063301696 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548323330854 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103510090298 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348772388011 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.