Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The boom of technology has drastically changed the way human communicate with each other. Some people think that it has turned them into more sociable people but others hold an opposite view. In my opinion, the technology does not make people more sociable, but rather give them chances for more connections.
On the one hand, modern technologies, particularly social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. have acted as a platform to bring individuals to a greater connection. They would have many more chances to make friends and to widen their relations. For instance, people can find friends or even life-partners who might share the same interests and hobbies via plenty of online groups. Additionally, these sites can as well help families and friends who live far away from each other to update, share and have a better understanding about their loved ones.
On the other hand, due to the great convenience of these modern tools, a rising number of people have become heavily addicted to them. They pay much more attention to online activities than to real-life actions. It is very popular these days that groups of friends and families sit in a cafe together and use their own smart-phones but none of them has a face-to-face talk. Consequently, actual relationships become disjointed and gradually die out as individuals take more interest in online communities who they have never met face-to-face before or who they are unlikely to ever meet in the future.
In conclusion, even though modern technologies are very much helpful to people in many ways, it is clear to me that they do not help people to be more sociable but only give them broader connection for more new relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'make'.
Suggestion: make
...n. They would have many more chances to makes friends and to widen their relations. F...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03521126761 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8046653258 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9745497359 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297991589651 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104317682523 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122044227757 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204234510147 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163820635875 0.056905535591 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.