Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.
Some people argue that more money ought to be allocated to preserving rare species, whilst others have the opposite view. I personally think that the government should fund different protecting programs for two reasons.
First of all, shielding jeopardized species is vital for the biodiversity of our planet. Not only will a species’ obliteration affect the vegetation and the wildlife of the region but also change the rate at which new types of animal appear. Moreover, if some kind of animal ceases to exist, the local bio balance may fail and an ongoing avalanche of disappearance may begin. To illustrate, one may remember the story about an island from which pirates took all local cats 200 years ago. Not this island is rife with rodents, and they ate these and grass. Such a scenario will probably happen if we do not address the issue of species protection.
Secondly, by funding the protection of endangered species, the authorities will raise the level of awareness about the issue among the population of a country. Hence, it can be used as a catalyzer of the local level of education about nature and the environment. People become enthusiastic for solving global problems such as global warming and sea levels rise. In order to promote the concern about natural problems, the government could direct money flow to the publicity and the popular literature about the conservation of species. For instance, every zoo in the world has a program that educates children about the need to help nearly extinct animals such as panda. The program is very effective when a child could see a real panda after reading about pandas’ downsizing.
In conclusion, there is a necessity to spend a substantial amount of money on the protection of endangered species. This would help to sustain the biodiversity of the planet and promote concern about issues of nature among people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83010461122 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608974358974 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2453153221 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178722757698 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566114450151 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071354672398 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132211341656 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109571570123 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.