Over the last few decades, remarkable advances have been made in the field of technology. Workers can gain enormous and terrific benefits from the technology but, the other side of the coin, the technology has affected workers, exceedingly. In this essay, I will elaborate both the merits and the demerits of the technology.
Firstly, technology has helped workers in many ways. To illustrate, in this hypercompetitive world everything is bound to time management. Computer technology has helped in many ways to accomplish the work in stipulated time for instance, to administrative officer computer technology has helped enormously in record keeping jobs such as recording the details or seeking for particular details, they don't have to look into many books; everything is on fingertips. Human life survival has virtually dependent on new technologies in a wide range.
In contrast, new technologies have replaced the plethora of workers. To illustrate, telecommunication and networking technologies have replaced much of the post office works. Two decades ago postmen were earning their livelihood by delivering letters to the destination places but now these technologies have become detrimental to postmen jobs; it is not only postmen jobs, but also, most of the human involved works, tremendously. Which is a negative sign and can be an arduous to human life survival in coming days.
To recapitulate, the technology has helped human enormously in reducing the much effort needed in record keeping jobs and other fields as well, on the other hand, it has replaced most of the workers, adversely. In my view, there must be a limitation in the technology being used so that we can still use the technology in a way which will not affect workers' livelihood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...or seeking for particular details, they dont have to look into many books; everythin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, still, well, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28368794326 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10601863209 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.351364533 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.615384615 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150412970736 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582254534533 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539272370354 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959381621964 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220848883392 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.