Some people think that non-academic subjects (eg physical education and cookery ) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects?
Highly experienced people claim that non-academic subjects at schools, such as physical education and cookery could be removed from the syllabus, students can concentrate on their academic subjects. I disagree with this notion because of another subject is also essential for every pupil.
It is generally axiomatic that education plays an indispensable role in building a successful career of a person. The main advantage of the non-academic subject is that every student can easily enhance their knowledge of extra-curricular activities which can lead to the development of every person in their life. For example, as the students know about physical education, then they could not grapple any problem about health issues and it may help to build the confidence level of the students in every field of work. Eventually, people can start participating in such activity of non-academic subjects around the globe, like International tournaments.
Moving further, even if the people learn both academic and other subjects since they can easily do higher education in a foreign country which can assist them to broaden the horizons of insight of distinctive things in their life span. For instance, a Cambridge study revealed that today, more and more learners migrate abroad for a bright future, if the children learn cooking at school, then they can easily cook any type of food without any help of the mother. In the long run, the enhancement of every student and a nation could increase in the world in the future.
To end, although it is a decent way to learn academic and non-academic subjects due to which they can get a chance to enhance their knowledge and develop several skills in their career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect is also essential for every pupil. It is generally axiomatic that education...
^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cook'.
Suggestion: to cook
... a bright future, if the children learn cooking at school, then they can easily cook an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1690647482 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81460511738 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8625599041 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.7 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32517904669 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136363464239 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141402149368 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229181426502 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116703140891 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.