Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and the other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is considered that now lower cost of fuel and cars is leading to environmental issues. Also, some people argue that if we can proliferate costs of them, it would be successful solve. I completely disagree that this condition would be hazardous for some countries economy and chemical industry, and there is another solve that to change cars engine to another one which use renewable resources.
On the one hand, some people believe that car industry is accelerating air pollution. For that, anyway, in others point of view, government should grow the costs in order to reduce this process. To illustrate, it is true that higher cost may discourage people, for example in Norway, and they may immediately give up to use their own vehicles. Although increasing costs can be solve in short term, there has other way to avoid environmental problems.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that to create or use electric cars will be good solution. If we can pass this level, there is no doubt, people can be able to drive their own cars without toxic fumes. For example, if we stay one point that using only oil for engines, environment will unavailable to live in the near future. Apart from that using electric engines in car industry can be profitable for some developing countries. Because they can not be able to own oil resources.
Overall, from possible causes of improving costs, I completely disagree that this solve will convenient for people more than create new solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...s condition would be hazardous for some countries economy and chemical industry, and ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ofitable for some developing countries. Because they can not be able to own oil resourc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, if, may, so, apart from, for example, in short, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90079365079 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64963797163 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1637986352 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282114726019 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105216445919 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549191554663 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1799361586 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719804218382 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.